Exploring Redash, Project Jupyter & Visivo

Redash vs. Project Jupyter vs. Visivo

Compare key features, capabilities, and differentiators between Redash, Project Jupyter, Visivo. This comprehensive analysis will help you make an informed decision for your data visualization needs.

Quick Comparison

Key features and capabilities at a glance

Feature	Redash	Project Jupyter	Visivo
Deployment Model	Self-host (open-source), Docker deployment, Community cloud forks	Open-source (local), Jupyter server, JupyterHub deployment	Open-source, Cloud Service, Self-hosted
Pricing	Open-source (BSD 2-Clause); acquired by Databricks, maintained community version.	Free (BSD license)	Open source (GPL-3.0)
Cost	$	$	$
Git Integration
CI/CD & Testing
Real-time
AI Features
Visual to Code
DAG-Based

Target Users & Use-Cases

Each BI tool is designed with specific user personas in mind.

Redash

SQL analystsData engineersTechnical teams needing quick dashboards

Project Jupyter

Data scientistsResearchersEngineers

Visivo

Analytics EngineersData teamsBusiness usersEngineers

Ease of Development & Deployment

Development experience directly impacts team productivity and time-to-value.

Redash

2/5

Project Jupyter

2/5

Visivo

5/5

Key Integrations & Ecosystem

A robust ecosystem of integrations is essential for modern BI tools.

Redash

SQL and NoSQL databasesAPI-based data sourcesSimple query runner architecture

Project Jupyter

Python/Julia/R librariesSQL connectorsCustom API integrations

Visivo

dbt coreAll major databasesCustom connector frameworkSlack for alertsGithub

Visualization Capabilities

The ability to create compelling visualizations is key to data storytelling.

Redash

Very basic visualizations: each query can be visualized as a table, chart (line, bar, pie, scatter) or pivot. Limited formatting options. Dashboards are grids of query results visualizations and text. Suited for lightweight reporting.

Project Jupyter

Not a conventional BI tool – it's a computing environment. Visuals come from libraries (Matplotlib, Plotly, etc.) within code cells. Highly flexible outputs (any HTML/JS). Sharing typically static (not interactive unless using Voila or similar to create dashboards).

Visivo

Highly custom UI with easy defaults

Detailed Differentiators

Each platform's unique strengths and limitations.

Redash

Light footprint, easy to deploy. Great for engineers to quickly share SQL results with team (share link to dashboard).

Minimal feature set by modern standards: no semantic layer, weak visualization variety, and no fine-grained permissions (all users can see all queries by default in OSS). The project has slowed development (Databricks shifted focus).

Project Jupyter

Extreme flexibility – you can do anything in code. Huge ecosystem of libraries for analysis and visualization.

Not user-friendly for non-coders; to share insights, often notebook is converted to PDF/HTML which is static. Multi-user collaboration and security are not provided out-of-the-box (need JupyterHub or similar).

Visivo

BI-as-code approach enables version control, collaboration, and CI/CD workflows. DAG-based architecture provides powerful data transformation capabilities and dependency management. Seamless visual-to-code workflow allows both technical and non-technical users to build dashboards effectively.

Requires understanding of data concepts; not a pure drag-and-drop tool like Tableau. Initial setup requires technical knowledge for optimal configuration.

Security & Architecture

Critical considerations for enterprise deployments.

Redash

DB Access: Yes, stores DB credentials and queries the source directly for each refresh. Virtualization: No – it's a thin layer over the DB. Push: No, only pull (with caching of recent results). Other: Basic user roles; can embed visualizations via public URLs (security relies on random tokens). Lacks advanced security features like row-level controls.

Project Jupyter

DB Access: If a notebook connects to a DB, it does so directly (with credentials in code or config). Virtualization: No – but you could use tools like Trino via Python to virtualize in code. Push: No, unless custom code to push data. Other: Jupyter itself has no auth (except if behind JupyterHub). Security concerns if sharing notebooks with sensitive data output.

Visivo

No db access required. Very strong security features due to the DAG-based access controls and the push based deployment model.

Why Visivo Stands Out

While each platform has its strengths, Visivo offers unique advantages for modern data teams.

DAG-Based Architecture for complex data transformations

Visual to Human-readable Code conversion

Multiple development approaches for all skill levels

AI-Powered dashboard creation

Full Git integration and version control

Open-source with enterprise features

Ready to Experience Modern BI?

Try Visivo today and see how it transforms your data analytics workflow.

$ curl -fsSL https://visivo.sh | bash

Start Free Trial Request a Demo


Email	Mute	End Chat