Exploring Looker (Google), Evidence.dev & Visivo
Looker (Google) vs. Evidence.dev vs. Visivo
Compare key features, capabilities, and differentiators between Looker (Google), Evidence.dev, Visivo. This comprehensive analysis will help you make an informed decision for your data visualization needs.
Quick Comparison
Key features and capabilities at a glance
Feature | Looker (Google) | Evidence.dev | Visivo |
---|---|---|---|
Deployment Model | Cloud-hosted (Google Cloud) | Self-host (static site), Self-host (server), Vercel/Netlify deployment | Open-source, Cloud Service, Self-hosted |
Pricing | Commercial (Proprietary); enterprise pricing (no free tier) | Open-source (MIT); free to use. New hosted service as of fall 2024 (can also deploy on Vercel, Netlify, etc.) | Open source (GPL-3.0) |
Cost | $$$$$ | $ | $ |
Git Integration | |||
CI/CD & Testing | |||
Real-time | |||
AI Features | |||
Visual to Code | |||
DAG-Based |
Target Users & Use-Cases
Each BI tool is designed with specific user personas in mind.
Looker (Google)
Evidence.dev
Visivo
Ease of Development & Deployment
Development experience directly impacts team productivity and time-to-value.
Looker (Google)
Evidence.dev
Visivo
Key Integrations & Ecosystem
A robust ecosystem of integrations is essential for modern BI tools.
Looker (Google)
Evidence.dev
Visivo
Visualization Capabilities
The ability to create compelling visualizations is key to data storytelling.
Looker (Google)
Robust web dashboards and exploratory interface. Good selection of chart types; custom visualizations via plugins or custom code. Highly customizable via LookML for data logic, but visual formatting is UI-driven (some limitations vs. Tableau).
Evidence.dev
Reports built as Markdown with embedded SQL and charts. Outputs static HTML dashboards. Customization via editing Markdown/HTML/CSS; not a point-and-click UI.
Visivo
Highly custom UI with easy defaults
Detailed Differentiators
Each platform's unique strengths and limitations.
Looker (Google)
Evidence.dev
Visivo
Security & Architecture
Critical considerations for enterprise deployments.
Looker (Google)
DB Access: Yes (direct read queries to DB with cached results). Virtualization: No internal engine – relies on source DB ('in-database' analytics). Push: No, pull-based queries (though persistent derived tables can be pushed into DB). Other: Fine-grained RBAC; row-level security; SSO/SAML support.
Evidence.dev
DB Access: Queries run at build time (or page load if in server mode); not needed for end viewer (static pages). Virtualization: By nature, it materializes results into the page (no live DB query once published). Push: Yes – essentially a push of data into static site. Other: No runtime user management (pages are static); security depends on where you host (you wouldn't include sensitive data in a public build).
Visivo
No db access required. Very strong security features due to the DAG-based access controls and the push based deployment model.
Why Visivo Stands Out
While each platform has its strengths, Visivo offers unique advantages for modern data teams.
Ready to Experience Modern BI?
Try Visivo today and see how it transforms your data analytics workflow.
$ curl -fsSL https://visivo.sh | bash