Exploring Looker (Google), Omni & Visivo
Looker (Google) vs. Omni vs. Visivo
Compare key features, capabilities, and differentiators between Looker (Google), Omni, Visivo. This comprehensive analysis will help you make an informed decision for your data visualization needs.
Quick Comparison
Key features and capabilities at a glance
| Feature | Looker (Google) | Omni | Visivo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deployment Model | Cloud-hosted (Google Cloud) | Cloud (SaaS on AWS), Private cloud, Enterprise VPC | Open-source, Cloud Service, Self-hosted |
| Pricing | Commercial (Proprietary); enterprise pricing (no free tier) | Commercial (Proprietary SaaS); demo & trial available (pricing not public) | Open source (GPL-3.0) |
| Cost | $$$$$ | $$$$ | $ |
| Git Integration | |||
| CI/CD & Testing | |||
| Real-time | |||
| AI Features | |||
| Visual to Code | |||
| DAG-Based |
Target Users & Use-Cases
Each BI tool is designed with specific user personas in mind.
Looker (Google)
Omni
Visivo
Ease of Development & Deployment
Development experience directly impacts team productivity and time-to-value.
Looker (Google)
Omni
Visivo
Key Integrations & Ecosystem
A robust ecosystem of integrations is essential for modern BI tools.
Looker (Google)
Omni
Visivo
Visualization Capabilities
The ability to create compelling visualizations is key to data storytelling.
Looker (Google)
Robust web dashboards and exploratory interface. Good selection of chart types; custom visualizations via plugins or custom code. Highly customizable via LookML for data logic, but visual formatting is UI-driven (some limitations vs. Tableau).
Omni
Combines spreadsheet-like calculations, SQL, and drag/drop. Users can create charts with one-click from data tables. Good selection of standard visuals, with focus on ease (smart defaults). Custom styling is somewhat guided (aims for simplicity over exhaustive options).
Visivo
Highly custom UI with easy defaults
Detailed Differentiators
Each platform's unique strengths and limitations.
Looker (Google)
Omni
Visivo
Security & Architecture
Critical considerations for enterprise deployments.
Looker (Google)
DB Access: Yes (direct read queries to DB with cached results). Virtualization: No internal engine – relies on source DB ('in-database' analytics). Push: No, pull-based queries (though persistent derived tables can be pushed into DB). Other: Fine-grained RBAC; row-level security; SSO/SAML support.
Omni
DB Access: Yes, Omni directly queries your databases (encrypted connections). Virtualization: Queries data in place (no data copy) – essentially virtualization with a semantic layer. Push: No, it's live query (though cached metrics can be materialized on demand). Other: Strong security focus – column & row-level controls, SAML SSO, data encrypted at rest. SOC 2 compliant.
Visivo
No db access required. Very strong security features due to the DAG-based access controls and the push based deployment model.
Why Visivo Stands Out
While each platform has its strengths, Visivo offers unique advantages for modern data teams.
Ready to Experience Modern BI?
Try Visivo today and see how it transforms your data analytics workflow.
$ curl -fsSL https://visivo.sh | bash
